Facebook | Double Glazing Jobs | Guest Contributions | Contact | Terms

Renegade Conservatory Guy

Join RenegadeClub and get FREE email updates from me...

Posts Tagged ‘glass and glazing federation’

Why the GGF should learn from the DGCOS

Monday, May 17th, 2010

Whatever you think about the Double Glazing and Conservatory Ombudsman Scheme (DGCOS) you can’t argue that this new organisation has made a big impact in such a short period of time. 

In the last couple of weeks there’s been high profile TV appearances, threats of legal action against the BBC, press releases and articles springing up all over the internet (including on the Energy Saving Trust website) and quite a lot of debate on the GlassTalk website (not all of which is entirely accurate).

It is very welcome news that six representatives of the DGCOS are attending GlassTalk next Thursday at Walton Hall to talk to members of our industry, some of which are confused and sceptical about the scheme (and I include myself as one of those individuals).  I have emailed Tony Pickup and suggested that I am keen to have a chat with him about the scheme to help me overcome some of the concerns I have, and I await his reply.

If the scheme is a genuine attempt to ‘repair the industry’s reputation’ then I would support it.  Why wouldn’t I?

Indeed, although I have concerns about the scheme I feel I must say how impressed I have been with the PR and marketing campaign they have employed.  And I feel the Glass and Glazing Federation (GGF), which my company is now a member of, should recognise and learn lessons from their marketing strategy.

Firstly, employing Nick Ross (the former Watchdog presenter) as the face of the DGCOS is a master stroke.  I’m confident that most consumers will see this as a safe endorsement of the DGCOS by a respected proponent in the battle against rogue traders.

The following video has a strong message for any consumer who is worried about which double glazing company to choose:

The website is well constructed also.  It is easy to navigate, designed to appeal to consumers, and will start ranking on search engines in the long run (although I doubt it is getting much search engine traffic at the moment).

Take a look at the website at www.dgcos.org.uk as it’s very good.  They’re even pushing consumers to fill their details in if they’re looking for a DGCOS accredited installer.  I assume the leads generated are passed to their nearest installer.  As a GGF member, I’m still awaiting the first lead to be passed to me, so this is a sensible move by the DGCOS.

In comparison, the GGF website is stuck in the Twentieth Century:

The GGF website is badly designed, poorly constructed and is doing NOTHING for its members.  Take a look at:

www.ggf.org.uk

Last year, I was invited to sit down with the board members of the GGF to discuss their website and I explained and demonstrated the problems with the existing website and improvements that needed making.  I recommended starting again and rebuilding the whole website in a format that ranks well on search engines, and really sells the benefits of consumers choosing a GGF member.  The ironic thing is the GGF website has a high Page Rank with some quality links to it, and with a bit of work could be top of the search engines for many of the key phrases consumers seach for.  At the moment, the GGF website will get very little traffic in comparison to websites like Conservatory Outlet, Anglian, Conservatory Land, Safestyle etc.

If the GGF website was generating leads, and demonstrating to consumers the benefits of choosing a GGF member, then both the GGF and its members would benefit.

Unfortunately, despite interest at the time (and I accept I was slow at emailing a proposal) nothing came of the meeting I had, and the GGF website has not improved in the meantime.

In light of recent developments, I feel that now is the time for the GGF to stop thinking about it and start acting.  The website needs an overhaul and this means an investment in it.  Without sounding arrogant, I feel I have more knowledge in this area than most in the industry and I offer my services and advice to the GGF if required.  The GGF website has so much untapped potential!

And, in general, the GGF needs to start leading the way in getting the message across to consumers that purchasing new windows, doors and conservatories from reputable companies is a safe and rewarding investment.

The wait is over: Approved Docs L and F are published

Friday, April 30th, 2010

I do apologise to everyone who got the impression from a previous post that I might be retiring from RCG.  It appears I’ve not done a very good job of it.

Anyway, here’s a press release that might be of interest:

The Glass and Glazing Federation (GGF) is extremely pleased to note from the final Approved Document L (Conservation of Fuel and Power) and Approved Document F (Ventilation) for England and Wales, announced on  30 April 2010, that the Communities and Local Government (CLG) have listened to the representations  of the Federation and the industry.

Giles-Willson,-Technical-Di

The principal changes announced were as follows:

  • For replacement windows, compliance to be based on Window Energy Rating Band C (currently Band E) with an alternative of a U Value of not worse than 1.6 W/m2K (currently 2.0). The centre pane alternative of 1.2 remains but for a limited range of applications only.
  • Conservatories: The current exemption clause remains
  • The potentially burdensome requirement of ‘Consequential Improvements’ has been excluded.
  • A proposal for trickle vents to be fitted to all replacement windows has been dropped (under strong pressure from the GGF).
  • For WERs it is pleasing to note that the calculations, bandings and a common basis for sensible control measures are listed within Advanced Document L ensuring consistency between potential future operators and thereby providing a level playing field for the industry and clarity for the consumer.

These will be become mandatory from 1 October 2010.

The GGF is also pleased to note that the corresponding requirements for replacement windows in Scotland will be similarly based (though not identical) which will ease the cross-border disparity that has existed since 2002.  This will be particularly welcomed by those members operating in both Scotland and England.

GGF will be providing a fuller analysis for its members in due course and is collaborating with seminars planned for FENSA registered businesses over May and June to provide detailed guidance on compliance and changes required to the registration and inspection process.

The GGF and its Technical Director Giles Willson have been heavily involved throughout the consultation process, initially through the Fenestration Industry Thermal Performance Working Group, and continuing via close contact with CLG up to finalisation of the Documents. They have thereby ensured that the industry’s needs have been conveyed to the CLG and well reflected in a balanced final document supportive to the needs of the industry. Their input has been influential on behalf of its members and the wider industry, as it was with the consultations for the 2002 and 2006 editions of the regulations.

Stand up and be counted: Sign the ‘Windows Scrappage Scheme’ Petition Now!

Thursday, September 24th, 2009

GGF Press Release

The Glass & Glazing Federation (GGF) has petitioned the government to introduce a scrappage scheme, whereby householders are encouraged to scrap their old poorly insulated windows in return for a £1,000 grant towards the installation of new, professionally installed, energy efficient ones. The petition has been set up through the ePetition Scheme on the Official website of the Prime Minister’s Office at:

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/windowscrappage

The benefits of this scheme for window manufacturers, suppliers and installers would be increased sales and a reversal in the downward trend in the number of installed windows and doors. Consumers would save £1,000 and enjoy a facelift to their homes, along with lower fuel bills and more energy efficient homes. And the government would benefit from reduced emissions from the existing housing stock, helping it to meet the necessary greenhouse gas emissions targets. The government would also reclaim some of the grant money in VAT.

Sign-the-Windows-Scrappage-

“Energy Efficient Windows (EEWs) have a huge role to play in improving the thermal performance of the existing housing stock,” Nigel Rees, Chief Executive of the GGF, explained. “EEWs can reduce emissions by 10% from dwellings nationally and reduce national domestic energy expenditure by 10%.

“The glass and window industry represents over 100,000 employees. Currently direct sell windows and doors fell by 12% in 2008 and a further 14% in 2009. The forecast is for a further 10% drop in 2010. In 2008 FENSA registered 880,831 installations made up of 3,292,437 windows and 761,054 doors. The GGF strongly believes that the proposals to incentivise the professional installation of new energy efficient windows are the only logical way forward.”

Five hundred signatures are needed to take the petition to the next stage. Given the size of the industry, and the popularity of WERs, the GGF expects the petition to receive many more signatures than that.

GGF responds to BBC online feature

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

ggf

Ian Chisholm from the GGF’s response to the BBC article ‘A plague of Plastic Windows’:

English Heritage carries out some wonderful work in protecting our historical built environment. But now and again the organisation’s rather extremist, sweeping diktats expose a very narrow point of view.

The Glass and Glazing Federation represents the whole of the UK glass and glazing industry and has no preference for any particular Fenestration material. Our stance is that what must be central in choosing new windows for any installation is that the design is appropriate to the specific property into which it is being installed, as well as adjacent properties and the surrounding area. With that established, there are some fine windows produced in PVC-U, just as there are poor windows manufactured using timber. To sweep aside any material without considering all of the options is inappropriate.

We cannot believe that having timber windows that look tatty, are poorly maintained and offer inadequate protection against the elements (and which are therefore inevitably energy inefficient), rather than well designed frames in PVC-U, performing to the highest standards of energy efficiency and comfort, makes any sense.

Whatever choice one makes, choose well designed and manufactured windows, in appropriate style for the property being installed as well as the surrounding area, in finishes that are again appropriate (for example, choose a cream coloured PVC-U window, rather than high white); and of course, from a reputable manufacturer and installer such as a GGF member.

Ian Chisholm
Glass and Glazing Federation

  • Sponsors

  • image widget
  • image widget
  • image widget
  • image widget
  • image widget
  • image widget
© 2010 Renegade Conservatory Guy