Facebook | Double Glazing Jobs | Guest Contributions | Contact | Terms

Renegade Conservatory Guy

Join RenegadeClub and get FREE email updates from me...

Posts Tagged ‘energy efficient windows’

Will the cold spell increase energy efficiency?

Saturday, January 23rd, 2010

If the recent cold period doesn’t jolt homeowners into necessary energy efficiency measures, nothing will, according to experts.

RICS which has a Royal Charter that obliges it to act in the public interest, says there are thousands of homes in the UK without sufficient measures in place to ensure energy efficiency, leaving them exposed to freezing conditions.

The organisation, whose members include energy assessors and building control officers, says that these homes will have experienced a significant increase in their energy bills as a result of the cold weather.

Personally, I can’t wait for all those gas bills to start landing on door mats!!

Obviously, the easiest solution for homeowners will be cheaper solutions such as loft insulation, although I do feel that demand for double glazing will improve. I’ve shown Google Trends graphs before, as I do feel they give an indication of demand in the UK, and it certainly looks to me like more people are looking for both loft insulation and double glazing this January, compared to last January.

loft insulation double glazing

Maybe, just maybe, it’s going to a good year for the window industry. I have a different point of view for conservatories, but I’ll develop my thoughts there in a different post.

Happy New Year ???

Monday, January 11th, 2010

I’ll supply a write up about Cycle India when I get a minute, but I just wanted to touch base with everyone about the weather.

I’ve come back to a window factory running at half capacity. We’d normally expect a slow start in the first week or two, but the severe weather conditions have seriously affected fitting.

I’ve spoken with a number of our installers, and they were all badly affected last week with the weather. Conservatory bases were virtually impossible to build with the ground frozen, and that is assuming the builders could get to site. Window installations seem to have been tricky also, with customers being quite rightly concerned about windows being pulled out in such inclement weather. One of our dealers suggested they are installing downstairs windows and doors this week, but can’t do upstairs windows as it’s too dangerous putting ladders up.

It has also been tricky getting to site to measure new work, or even quote new work. I suspect that installation departments throughout the UK are currently battling away trying to reschedule jobs, and keep customers happy.

I suspect that this bad weather could well be the final nail in the coffin for some companies in our industry, who may well have just clung on after Christmas, but not being able to fit has seriously affected cash flow at the hardest time of the year.

I certainly cannot remember a cold period like this in my life time, and have certainly never witnessed such delays to installation schedules.

The good news is that new leads seem to be very brisk as you would expect. And, I feel that this cold snap could just be a blessing in disguise as in the Spring consumers may reflect on the winter period, and consider upgrading to more energy efficient windows.

How has your company been affected by the weather?

Smoke and mirrors | BFRC Rating Scheme

Tuesday, December 15th, 2009

Guest post by Kevin Ahern

In my recent quest to understand the BFRC rating scheme, I seem to have misunderstood a lot of what the scheme is all about so I thought I would try to simplify my current thoughts in the topic.

energy_rated-Window

The BFRC claim that A rated windows are net heat providers of your home. Ref. Giles Willson (at Glassex), Maurice Levitt (consultant and physicist), various correspondence, Graham Hinett (Fensa Times Dec 09) et al, and I am sure, many others, on numerous occasions, yet the BFRC guidance notes explain that the scheme is purely a comparison for windows and NOT an absolute performance measurement.

You see my confusion?

The document that explains the calculation of the formula (that has been peer, industry and academia reviewed) suggests that the sun provides more power in Aberdeen than it does in Plymouth. You see my confusion?

The same document goes into great detail about a Dutch reference house and quotes a number of British and European standards (and uses them negligibly) but does not state the reference source of the solar data that it uses. Calculations from the ASHRAE standards in the US suggest UK solar flux of up to 275 KWhrs/sq mtr (South facing) and 15Kwhrs /sq mtr (North), yet the BFRC manages to arrive at an average of 218.6 Kwhrs in their formula.

You see my confusion?

The scheme has been proposed as the only method of compliance to the 2010 part L regs, yet its administrators do not appear to grasp the issue of whether the WER is an accurate energy assessment or a marketing window comparison tool.

You see my confusion?

We are now being asked to pay lots of money to the BFRC for the privilege of having our products and businesses assessed to this compliance criteria in return for a colourful piece of paper, in which the resultant rating is neither a comparison or a net heat balance figure, or both.

You see my confusion?

Those amongst us who are actively selling A Rated windows to the public as net heaters of their property, could well be actually mis-selling and telling our customers lies (if the BFRC guidance notes 2007 are still valid). Could the customer sue you if your salesmen sold your windows as providing more heat than they lost?

You see my confusion?

Now the easy bit, this scheme has been purportedly government supported and designed to help the general public better understand the products we are selling them, ironically, along the way the BFRC appear to have forgotten the fundamentals of what their rating scheme is!

On the positive side, at least the scheme has the potential to be the only tool for the government to police our domestic replacement window industry, and a further benefit, by a strange coincidence (with the amount of solar gain claimed in the formula), it would also seem to offer an extended shelf life to some of the older generation Low E glasses, that, while not offering the best U values, let just enough more sun in to balance that problem out!

You see my confusion?

I have attempted to address some of these issues with the BFRC, but unfortunately, they give the impression that they are the scientists and therefore know best. The technical responses would appear to be based on the smoke and mirrors approach and actual answers very difficult to get to.

To summarise, I think the scheme has fallen between 2 camps, energy rating and window comparison, but wants to be seen as all things to all people. The problem lies in the application, accuracy and authenticity of the solar data , which for the purpose of windows in this heating dominant climate, is of limited value and should be thus be ignored anyway. The only data on the certificates, should be the window characteristics, (U and G values), and if the government wants to reduce fuel consumption it should insulate and use U values.

Any winter solar benefit (or summer overheating cost) is so dependant on specific site installation criteria (window size, orientation, trees, neighbouring houses and any other shading) that it has little or no place in a national window rating scheme for the installation of product into existing housing stock.

Ask yourself a question. Low iron glass, why ? Is this marvelous UV transparent product such a benefit to our society that we have long neglected it at our cost? Or is it just another gimmick to scrape a few more theoretical numbers on to our colourful pieces of paper?

Are we as an industry doing our bit to help James Strawbridge save the planet? Are we as an industry helping the government with the building regs 2010 Part L implementation?

Or, as some may argue, is the window industry taking the Mick out of Mr Strawbridge, the building regs, you and me, and worst of all, the consumer?

You see my confusion?

Kevin Ahern

10 Reasons to be optimistic about the future

Sunday, November 8th, 2009

I thought I’d put in words why I feel we’re in a unique position right now which is unlike any other time I’ve experienced running a uPVC window and conservatory company.

We’re at a turning point where I believe that well positioned, financially sound, forward thinking companies in our industry are in a great position to strengthen their position, grow sales and make profits in the coming years. I’m focussing my thoughts on installation companies and fabricators in the residential uPVC sector, although my thinking can also apply to associated companies.

1. Downturn levelling out for uPVC industry

Over the last two years the market for uPVC windows, doors and conservatories has contracted dramatically. In fact, since 2003/2004 our industry has been in continual decline.

The latest research suggests that this downward trend will continue in 2010, but at a far slower rate, levelling off in 2011 and maybe even growth returning in 2012. For any company that has maintained sales, or even grown their sales, during a time when the market has been shrinking so dramatically, will find a levelling off period feel like a real growth spurt. Imagine your company has grown sales over the last two years at 5% per year, when the market as a whole has declined 20% each year. If the market stabilises, then such a company would find 25% growth reasonably easy by comparison.

2. End of Recession

The UK has been in recession for 6 consecutive quarters. The Bank of England has recently pumped a further £25bn into the economy to help bring us out of recession. France and Germany exited recession in the second quarter, and the US came out of recession in the third quarter. It was a surprise that the UK did not return to growth in the third quarter, so it seems likely that the UK will follow the other major economies in Q4.

recession graph uk

I appreciate that it may seem tough right now, but with the media now talking about recovery, rather than talking about recession (or even depression) then I feel that gradually confidence will return. People buy our products when they feel confident about the future, particularly conservatories. As people start to feel more confident about the economy and their own position in it, then they are more likely to choose to purchase big ticket items.

3. Housing market picking up

The latest surveys from the Halifax and the Nationwide suggest that house prices have virtually recovered to the rates they were at 12 months ago.

house prices graph uk

I appreciate many experts are talking about houses prices going back down, but with fewer houses being built over the last few years, and the population increasing, there’s still an undersupply of housing.

I believe that we’ve seen the end of house price declines, and although we may not see growth like we have in the past, we will see growth nevertheless. Our industry relies on the movements in the housing market. As people move home, they either make improvements to increase their chances of a sale, or they make improvements to their new home after they’ve purchased.

The Home Information Packs will have improved demand for energy efficient windows and doors, and as more houses are bought and sold, then demand for windows and doors will increase.

Also, as house prices increase, then conservatories become a more sensible investment. As house prices are falling, then consumers could look unfavourably upon making investments in further extensions to their home. But, as house prices increase then people will feel more confident that a conservatory is a more sensible investment.

4. Mortgages / Interest Rates

People on variable rate mortgages have never had it so good. Even though you could argue that the banks are taking advantage of the low interest rates, and not passing the rates on to mortgages, I still feel that mortgage rates are at very low levels compared to recent history.

If the banks free up more capital, and relax their lending policy and if the interest rates stay at 0.5% for a sustained period then more mortgages will be granted. This will have a positive effect on house prices, and encourage people to remortgage to fund home improvements.

5. Lots of weaker competitors have disappeared

Although the number of fabricators and installers ceasing to trade so far in this recession has been lower than many people thought, I have certainly seen a number of my competitors go bust.

I have noticed that mostly the less professional, low price retailers have struggled and disappeared. Sure, many of these companies have phoenixed but often in a smaller way which will have less impact on the more professional survivors.

Now is a time to take market share!

6. Global warming / Climate Change

Whether you believe global warming and climate change is happening, I hate to say that this potential catastrophe is a short term opportunity for window companies.

polarbear

Some installers are taking this opportunity by the horns and successfully promoting energy efficient windows in a big way. With carbon emissions high on the global agenda and the current high cost of fuel, we are all looking for ways to make our homes more energy efficient. The more the industry gets together and pushes the energy saving message and lower fuel bills, then the more windows we will all sell.

7. Government Intervention

If the world is to fully tackle climate change, then Government intervention has to happen at some point.

In November 2008, the Government passed the Climate Change Act which set a legally binding target for the United Kingdom to reduce greenhouse gas, emissions by 80% compared to 1990 levels by 2050, with an interim target of 26% by 2020 (which has subsequently been increased to 34%).

Transport consistently grabs the headlines on climate change emissions but buildings pour out about half of the UK’s CO2 – 30% from homes, 20% from commercial buildings.

It is generally recognised that if you live in a single glazed house and install Energy Efficient Windows you could reduce the energy you use by 0.30 tonnes (or 18%) per year. The Government cannot just assume consumers will take the decision to install the latest in energy rated windows, or loft insulation, or any other energy saving product.

Government intervention has to happen at some point, whether through reduced VAT, a window scrappage scheme, grants or creating legal requirements for upgrading our homes, and when this happens our industry will be well positioned to benefit.

8. Timber Too Expensive

We can argue all day long about the environmental credentials of both PVC-U and timber windows. There are strong opinions from both sides.

But, one thing cannot be argued about. Good quality timber windows are out of the financial reach of the vast majority of homeowners. Whereas good quality uPVC windows are very affordable. This isn’t going to change, and with more foil options, better hardware, and more energy efficient uPVC options available, I believe that uPVC is ready to fight back!

saveatreebuyupvc

Save a tree, buy uPVC!

9. Replacing the Replacements

It doesn’t take a genius to point out that most houses now have uPVC windows these days – just drive down most housing estates in the UK and it’s perfectly clear.

The challenge now is to ‘replace the replacements’ and I believe this emerging market is gathering pace. Conservatory Outlet now sends all post consumer replacement uPVC windows off for recycling, and the numbers of frames we’re getting back from dealers is amazing (100-200 frames per week). Lister trade Frames recently pointed out that consumers are replacing relatively recent uPVC installations, so they can benefit from better designs and more energy efficient windows.

listertradeframesrecycling

Let’s face it, many of the uPVC windows and doors installed in the 1980’s and 1990’s was badly sold. As installation companies start replacing more uPVC windows, then the natural spirit of ‘Keeping Up With The Jones’ will gather pace.

10. Still a very big market!

Finally, I just want to point out that despite the fact that the double glazing and conservatory market has shrunk dramatically, it’s still a very, very big industry.

There’s loads of profitable work out there to be had.

You just need to know how to find it!

Glazing Quiz

Wednesday, October 7th, 2009

Guest post by Kevin Ahern

As the trade press is full of the BFRC and the WER scheme, I thought a little lighthearted quiz was in order to keep everyone up to speed. There are no prizes, there are probably no correct answers, but there is a multiple choice format that helps keep it simple.

Good luck, and have fun!

What does WER stand for?
a) Wobbly Energy Rantings
b) Window Energy Ratings
c) Wonderful Easy Revenue

Why do we need WERs?
a) To help consumers compare window performance
b) To help customers insulate their houses
c) To fudge the window insulation issue, so that glass U-values lose their significance

Why are WERs to be the only method of compliance to the proposed 2010 building regs part L?
a) for the sake of simplicity
b) U-values just aren’t trendy anymore
c) To fudge the window insulation issue, so that glass U-values lose their significance
d) To provide a cash cow for the certificate providers

How can you prove compliance to the proposed building regs part L
a) You can’t, the formulas aren’t public thus you can’t assess your own product
b) purchase the right to supply windows from the BFRC
c) use someone else’s certificate

How does FENSA fit into the WER equation?
a) Oh , err , umm
b) FENSA take the Low E test machine from their inspector’s briefcase
c) FENSA will commission a new printing press and will take subcontract work for all the industry certificates
d) FENSA will now rename to Office for Legal Development, Ratings Or Performance Excluded, so at least we know what we are giving money for

How is the WER applied to assess the window heat flow performance on different orientations?
a) It isn’t, it can’t
b) It doesn’t need to because it simplifies the complicated process of thinking, thus A is better than C, easy
c) It is a marketing tool

What monetary benefits are there by choosing an A rated window over a C rated window?
a) £26.48 per year
b) £80.00 per year
c) If your A rated window faces north, west or east you may be better off fitting a D rated window which could well have a lower U-value (whoops forgot part L)

What orientation is used to calculate the WERs
a) North
b) South
c) East
d) West
e) A thought out combination of all 4 ……………..sorry only joking, there is no option e

How much Solar gain (in Kwhr/M2) is included in the BFRC calculation?
a) Bucket Loads
b) 5 sunrays per second
c) The sun shining from Messrs Pilkingtons derrier
d) It’s top secret, so we can’t tell you

If DG units are being made with low iron glass and frames are being made with slimmer sightlines, does that mean more sun gets though?
a) Oh yes , lots of free energy
b) Hang on to your furnishings ladies, the patterns will disappear before your very eyes
c) Absolutely, you will be able to sell loads more of those aircon units for the summer, top added value (for the retailer)

How long will it take before a disgruntled householder complains that his A rated windows don’t seem to be heating his house?
a) never, customers believe everything they are told
b) never, because they don’t care
c) 1 good winter, but get fobbed off by the installation company

With the Energy Saving Trust, Building regs, and James Strawbridge all on board, who will be the next organization to sing the virtues of the WER?
a) The Tufty Club
b) Trading Standards
c) Citizens Advice Bureau
d) None of the above, although some may be interested in the claims being made.

If Trading Standards were to ask, “under what conditions will your A rated window be a net heater of a customers house?”, what will the response will be?
a) I have no idea, I just sell what the certificate says
b) It doesn’t matter, these windows are magic, the laws of nature don’t apply
c) Don’t tell anyone, but we have sunshine all year, if the customer can’t store this free summer energy for the winter that’s his problem.
d) Look, it is just a marketing tool, chill out man

After consideration, the verdict, so who has to pay the customer compensation for mis-selling?
a) The installer
b) The certificate holder
c) The certificate issuer

Finally, the BFRC Window Energy Rating scheme is being rolled out so that everyone has enough time to pay their money for some certificates, what would be your overall view of the scheme?
a) A great marketing tool for the proliferated installation end of the window market.
b) A simple and accurate way for the consumer to assess his energy needs.
c) A cynical manipulation of the building regs, by and for, the benefit of the industry big hitters, resulting in the bullying of the vast majority of the industry by a minority that might claim to represent it.

Ok, it is now time to work out your score

Mainly A’s
You are on the marketing bandwagon big time, I guess the scheme has you licking your lips for the added value you can get out of your customers.

Mainly B’s
Get off the fence, and either go for A or C, B is a daft choice of no real value unless you fell on it by accident and the spec is generally what you already offer.

Mainly C’s
I guess you have made the “fall in line” choice. It will enable you to trade and sell a product that will keep a market for big float glass manufacturers who haven’t invested in cutting edge low E technology as yet.

A broad mix of ABCD and E’s
Well you are pretty disgruntled that you are having to sell products that the industry declares are the best, but in reality, may not be for each individual customer. You are probably also a little miffed at having to pay for a certificate that only shows a notional rating in a marketing scheme, that perversely grants you permission to sell these products and thus contributes financially to the whole merry-go-round.

Just a little bit of fun, I hope you enjoyed it!

Don’t count on that energy saving

Sunday, September 20th, 2009

I was interested in reading an article on a New Zealand website entitled ‘Don’t Count on that Energy Saving’.

The writer argues that spending money on insulating your home won’t actually save you any money, or energy. He quotes various studies which suggest that people in better insulated homes often use more energy than those in less well insulated homes.

energyhome

What’s happening and likely to happen as the rush to insulate gathers momentum is people in cold homes suddenly find they have warm(er) homes and they like it. “So instead of taking savings by using less energy and having lower power bills, they’re taking the comfort instead,” says Branz scientist Nigel Isaacs.

I decided to do my own little study to see if this argument is valid. As we have installed A Rated windows in our home through the summer, I asked my wife if she was intending turning the boiler down a bit as a result of the new windows. She couldn’t understand why I was asking the question, and confirmed that she had no intention of changing the settings on the boiler.

The implication for our industry marketing the benefits of energy rated windows is obvious, but don’t worry I have intervened and reduced the temperature dial on the boiler.

The interesting conclusion from this article is that better insulated homes is more important for our health than for reducing our energy consumption. By retrofitting houses with better insulation it is estimated this could provide a health saving of $215.

Collins says providing warmer, drier homes for families and children is more important than energy savings. “Turn the argument on its head and you realise that one night spent in hospital is about the cost of installing ceiling and underfloor insulation in a home, and then you’ve got to ask where we are better spending our time and money.”

I wonder how many salesmen out there are currently using the better health message while demonstrating the benefits of double glazing? And taking the argument a stage further, surely there are health benefits of relaxing in a nice, warm conservatory.

Live longer….. buy double glazing and a conservatory!

Forget 5% VAT and double glazing grants, Gordon’s got a better idea!

Tuesday, September 1st, 2009

There’s been talk in the industry of reducing VAT on energy rated windows, or providing grants for people to upgrade their homes to double glazing. But, of course, the Government is unlikely to seriously consider these options as they cost the treasury money.

oldhouses

It seems, though, that the Government has been thinking of an alternative solution for encouraging people to upgrade the energy efficiency of their homes.

Wait for it. Drumroll, please…..

Penalise people who do not have double glazing!!!

Brilliant!

Instead of costing the taxman money, this will bring in loads of extra revenue.

According to the Telegraph:

Home owners who fail to introduce green measures could be forced to pay more Council Tax.

Under the new proposals, the Government would increase Council Tax and Stamp Duty for millions of homes that are not energy efficient.

It could also mean families are unable to sell their home unless they spend tens of thousands of pounds on getting their properties insulated and double-glazed.

The measures are widely expected to come into force this autumn.

Seriously, if this actually happens I will vote Labour, and tattoo ‘Gordon Brown is a very nice man’ on my bottom. I will also offer my services as a ‘double glazing warden’ and will assist the Government by reporting homes with single glazed windows and doors.

Is the WER system giving inaccurate results?

Friday, August 7th, 2009

Dear Mathew

I have a bit of a problem trying to understand the Window Energy ratings. I am sure that some big thinking has gone into them but my little thinking can’t make the numbers add up.

An example

2 unit types are quite commonly available but have different characteristics:-

Substantially they have a different U value, this is the amount of energy in watts, that they let through (per square metre) for each degree difference in temperature.

Also they differ with a g value, this number shows the amount of solar energy that the unit lets through, one would be 100%.

coat-hangers

Typically:
‘K’ unit U-value 1.5w/sq mtr/K g value 0.79
Softcoat unit U-value 1.1w/sq mtr/K g value 0.6

Now to me, and the wife, the glass to fit into a window for the best energy efficiency would be the softcoat as its insulation appears to be nearly 30% more efficient.

Why then, (if a common frame is used) do the WER calculations show the lesser insulated unit to have a better rating every time?

It would appear that the solar gain from all the lovely sunshine we receive from October to May (winter heating season) affects the calculations and because, the ‘K’ unit lets a bit more solar through, the fact that it is less of an insulator gets factored out.

Now this factoring effectively tells the industry the wrong story. I have seen a number of comments on designer and green forums dismissing the rating scheme as ‘overrating the solar input’ but what does that mean?

Some proofs

Heat usage in the UK from Oct-May (heating season) is calculated by using a number called degree days. This number equates the average difference between inside and outside temperatures and for how long? Using this figure we can actually calculate how much energy we lose through our glass.

BS EN ISO 14438 states that the degree days are 3000 for mid UK which equates to 72000 degree hours (3000 x 24hrs)

So let us assume that we have 1 sq mtr of glazing unit of each typical U-value:

At U= 1.5 we lose 1.5 watts for 1 sq mtr for each degree therefore
72000 x 1.5 = 108000watt hrs = 108 Kw hrs
Therefore, with a u-value of 1.5 you lose 108 Kw hrs of enrgy for every sq mtr of glazing

At U= 1.1 we lose 1.1 watts for 1 sq mtr for each degree therefore
72000 x 1.1 = 79200watt hrs = 79.2 Kw hrs
Therefore, with a u-value of 1.1 you lose 79.2 Kw hrs of enrgy for every sq mtr of glazing a saving of 28.8 Kw hrs for every sq mtr of glass, which I supposed you would expect.

How much does the sun help then, as we have calculated the loss and shown why U- values matter.

BS EN ISO 14438 states that the solar energy that might hit a south facing window is 497 kw hrs for every sqr metre, but also applies some restrictions, effectively it suggests that a dirt factor prevents 20% getting in, building shapes (utility) etc prevent 40% getting in, the g-value of the glass (remember that), OH and something the standard neglects…..clouds!! Which according to the met office obscure the sun for 68% of the time.

Let’s do a sum of what gets through:

497 Kw Hrs x 0.8 (dirt allowance) x 0.6 (Utility factor) x 0.32 (clouds) = 76.34 Kwhrs

Now 76.34 Kw hrs gets to the south facing glass, the g factor says what gets through
‘K’ has a ‘g’ of .79 so 76.34 x .79 = 60 Kw hrs
Softcoat has a ‘g’ of .6 so 76.34 x .6 = 45.8 Kw hrs

The sad fact is that for all other elevations the solar gain is a lot less, and has even less influence so at the very best comparing the unit types :

south elevation
heat loss solar gain nett heat losses
K -108 +60 -48.00
softcoat -79.2 +45.8 -33.40

The softcoat glazing loses less energy and on all the other elevations the softcoat shows even better advantage.

That is why I have a problem, as the WER formula calculates the K as a more efficient solution every time, when we have shown it not to be. If the rating system were to be specified in the building regs and subsequently found to be inaccurate, what would be the consequences?

Mathew, is there any effort in the industry to address this issue? Is there any will to address the issue? Or can you or your blog followers kindly explain why my calculations are wrong and hence, there is no issue!

Yours Concerned
Blog Follower

5% VAT for Energy Efficient Windows deal moves a step closer

Wednesday, July 1st, 2009

I understand from a very close friend, that the campaign to set a rate of 5% VAT on energy rated windows is a step closer today, after the concerted efforts of an unlikely champion.

Dave Blakeman, the MD of RPS (Roofwright Conservatory Software) has allegedly been deep in negotiation with Gordon Brown (the Prime Minister) to thrash out a deal to save the double glazing industry, whilst at the same time help the Government achieve it’s carbon emmissions targets.

The following picture of Dave was taken before the meeting on Monday 22nd June:

DaveAtNo10

Better known for his involvement with the conservatory business through the leading conservatory design software Roofwright, Dave is keen to move into the window market with an association with Eden window manufacturing software.

Personally, I think this is a very positive initiative and will keep you informed if anything comes of the meeting.

While at Number 10, Dave did discuss some other less interesting stuff with Mr Brown. I wouldn’t bother, but if you’re interested in reading about it then visit:

http://www.roofwright.com/News/uk_index.htm

Home Improvement internet search traffic continues to decline

Saturday, June 27th, 2009

A few months ago I wrote about the decline in the amount of people searching for terms like ‘conservatories‘ and ‘double glazing‘ on Google. It looks like this worrying trend is continuing if you look at the following two screenshots from Google trends:

Double Glazing

doubleglazingtrends

Conservatories

conservatorytrends

But, it’s not just terms relating to the double glazing industry, but most home improvement investments are suffering from fewer people searching for information about them:

Kitchens

kitchens

Home Improvements

homeimprovements

As always, the answer is to work even harder to make sure potential customers are attracted to your website rather than others, and then work hard to get the sale.

And, the positive news is that there are some products which are receiving increased interest, including ‘energy efficient windows‘ and ’solar panels’.

Solar Panels

solar panels

Energy Efficient Windows

energy efficient windows

  • Sponsors

  • image widget
  • image widget
  • image widget
  • image widget
  • image widget
  • image widget
© 2010 Renegade Conservatory Guy