Facebook | Double Glazing Jobs | Guest Contributions | Contact | Terms

Renegade Conservatory Guy

Join RenegadeClub and get FREE email updates from me...

Archive for the ‘Climate Change’ Category

Why I’ve decided to plant trees in Africa

Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

If you’re a regular reader you’ll know I’ve been grappling with the whole climate change issue for a while now.

Back in January 2009 I tried to set up a tree planting charity with a few other people from the industry, and actually went as far as creating  website called Trees4Windows.com.  At the time, I lost a bit of enthusiasm when I received negative feedback from some quarters, and then buried myself back into work commitments.  But, I never stopped thinking that I would at some point like to get involved with planting trees on a large scale.

Then, more recently I’ve been thinking about climate change a lot more, as a result of the post I wrote about whether humans are responsible for anthropogenic global warming.  The debate between John O’Sullivan and Canbanjo allowed me to research both the skeptic and ‘warmist’ points of view, and I’ve read a lot about the science supporting human induced global warming.

I have come to the conclusion that whether or not global warming is happening, the risks associated with not acting are greater than those associated with acting.  So, I am going to try cut my own personal CO2 emissions as much as I can, and try to reduce those of my company.  (By the way, I decided to order a BMW 318d rather than the Jag or the milk float, as the CO2 emissions are lowish, and fuel economy will save me money).

deforestation

I then started researching tree planting again.  Back in January 2009 I met up with the Woodland Trust to see if we could set up a deal with them for planting trees on a large scale, and with other companies from our industry taking part.  The problem for me was that to sponsor a tree is around £15 – which covers the cost of the tree, planting it, purchase of land, maintaining it over the coming years and a contribution towards the overheads of the charity.  To me, that’s not good value for money, and not enough trees could be planted.

So, I started researching dorestation and reforestion projects in the Amazon Rainforest.  There does seem to be a lot of focus on the Amazon Rainforest, and for very good reasons.  I found that the rate of deforestation in the area has slowed over recent years, so I then started researching deforestation in Africa, and found this website:

www.RippleAfrica.org

I was immediately impressed with the website and liked the feel of the charity, probably because it reminded me of Heal.  Ripple Africa is run by a husband and wife team, Geoff and Liz Furber, who are based in Buckingham.  They set up the charity around five years ago after purchasing a small property next to Lake Malawi and decided to start helping out the local community.

Malawi is one of the poorest countries in the world and the charity is involved in education, healthcare and environmental projects.  In particular, Geoff and Liz have put a lot of time and effort into setting up tree nurseries.

tree planting malawi

According to the website:

Trees in Malawi are being cut down at an alarming rate. An area of forest the size of a football pitch is cut down every 10 minutes. This tree planting project is centred in Nkhata Bay District, Malawi, Africa, an area of 4,000 sq.km which is about the size of Kent. Ultimately, we want to set up 400 community tree nurseries growing a total of 4 million trees per year.
Since 2006, we have helped 176 community tree nurseries to plant over three million trees, and we estimate that 3,000 people are working on this project. We are planting a combination of indigenous, exotic and fruit trees. The main aims of the project are to provide sustainable timber in woodlots for firewood, building, etc., to restore degraded land by planting indigenous trees, and to provide additional food using fruit trees and nitrogen-fixing trees. In addition to tree planting, we are also involved in environmental awareness training.

Trees in Malawi are being cut down at an alarming rate. An area of forest the size of a football pitch is cut down every 10 minutes. This tree planting project is centred in Nkhata Bay District, Malawi, Africa, an area of 4,000 sq.km which is about the size of Kent. Ultimately, we want to set up 400 community tree nurseries growing a total of 4 million trees per year.

Since 2006, we have helped 176 community tree nurseries to plant over three million trees, and we estimate that 3,000 people are working on this project. We are planting a combination of indigenous, exotic and fruit trees. The main aims of the project are to provide sustainable timber in woodlots for firewood, building, etc., to restore degraded land by planting indigenous trees, and to provide additional food using fruit trees and nitrogen-fixing trees. In addition to tree planting, we are also involved in environmental awareness training.

So, I made contact and went down to meet Geoff and Liz on Monday to find out more, particularly about the environmental side of their work.  I have to say, the passion and hard work that they put into this small charity is very inspiring, and they do it for free as volunteers.  The vast majority of the money they raise is sent to Malawi where they are now the largest employer in that area of Malawi.

They accept that it has not all been plain sailing, and they are still learning as they go, but they are making a real difference to the lives of very poor people.

I have decided to support the work of Ripple Africa, and particularly help fund their tree nursery projects.  We have agreed to fund 24 tree nurseries which will plant in the region of 72,000 trees per year.  We will promote the relationship with Ripple Africa through our Conservatory Outlet website.  The detail needs sorting out, but we will promote something like ‘For every conservatory we install, we will plant 50 trees in Malawi’.

I hate to use the term ‘carbon offsetting’ as the planting of trees in Malawi is more than just trying to help climate change.  Ripple Africa’s primar environmental objectives are to help local communities in Malawi to:

plant trees
reduce deforestation and land degradation
protect and manage the local environment
develop sustainable local livelihoods
alleviate poverty

I’m not for one minute suggesting that by partnering with Ripple Africa I’ll be making a massive contribution to fighting global warming.  The problem needs tackling head on by world leaders on a macro scale with a massive change in how we look at energy generation.

For me, I’m happy to be helping a small charity make a big difference.  I’ll finish this post by recommending you view the following video:

You can view other videos from Ripple Africa at:

http://www.youtube.com/user/rippleafrica#p/u 

If other companies are interested in helping Ripple Africa with their environmental projects, please contact me.  There is also the potential to resurrect the Trees4Windows concept with the focus on planting trees in Malawi.  I hope to visit Malawi in the Summer and see the tree nurseries in action.

In the meantime, I look forward to hearing your constructive thoughts…

Finally I’ve decided what car to buy

Saturday, March 6th, 2010

Back in July I asked for your help in deciding what type of car to buy.  To be honest, I’ve been dithering ever since, partly because I’ve been too busy thinking about other things, and partly because I’ve been wrestling with all this environmental stuff.

Anyway, when I flew over to Northern Ireland a month or so ago, on the way back I was browsing the inflight magazine and saw a pretty good write up for a Jaguar XF.  For those of you not particularly interested in cars (like me) this is what they look like:

jag xf

I decided this car looked quite nice, and the emissions were not too bad at 179 g/km.  I also quite liked the idea of driving a Jaguar as I am heading rapidly towards middle age.

But, just as I was about to order one, I asked the question on this website about whether humans are responsible for global warming.  As I gave the subject more thought, I started to harbour guilty thoughts about buying the Jag.

So, I went back to the drawing board to try find something more environmentally friendly.  I searched high and low and found that the best option for me is a Mega Electric Van. 

So, I think I’m going to buy this:

megavan

At home I use Good Energy as our electricity supplier which is 100% renewable energy.  So, by driving an electric vehicle I’ll actually be responsible for no CO2 emissions whatsover.  I’m going to get it sign written, and there’s plenty of space in the back for my sample windows.

There are a few disadvantages, such as a top speed of 30 mph and a maximum distance of 40-60 miles before needing a recharge.  As I’m keen to generate more dealers in the South of England I’m going to have to start going down the night before if I have a good lead (I don’t want to be late).

Also, I was wondering if any of you would mind me popping in when I need to recharge the battery.  I’ll just need to plug it into a standard socket for a couple of hours, then I’ll be on my way.

So what do you think?  Have I made the right decision here?

(Nb. I do have one other option I’m looking at as well, though. If this deal doesn’t come off, I might get a BMW 318d Business Edition with far lower emissions than the Jag at 120 g/km).

Is Anthropogenic Global Warming really a hoax?

Sunday, February 28th, 2010

When I suggested in a previous post that ‘Humans are responsible for Global Warming’ I wasn’t expecting the degree of debate the issue of Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) would generate on my site.

The main debate involves ‘canbanjo’ an architect who stumbled upon my site while searching for information about the Part L requirements for small extensions, and John O’Sullivan, an experienced climate sceptic who believes global warming is history’s biggest scam.

John’s profile on his blogger webpage states that he is a:

British crime writer and legal advocate, John O’Sullivan was born in 1961 in Berkshire, England, the son of immigrant Irish parents. An avid scholar, John taught and lectured for twenty years at various schools and colleges in the east of England. He litigated, with his second wife, a former New York correction officer, in one of America’s longest and most extraordinary sexual harassment cases. He has gleaned a wealth of knowledge and experience in filing court petitions, motions, mandamus and appeals in the New York State Division of Human Rights, mandamus petitions in the New York State Supreme Court, as well as US federal court. John has also prepared analysis and arguments used in UK criminal court that concerned police officer malfeasance. He has written two ‘Cupboard 55′ novels including ‘Summit Shock’ based on his wife’s epic story. Among the author’s other published credits are; ‘The Jimston Journal’, ‘Invisible Ink,’ ‘The Secret Attic,’ ‘Big Ugly Review and’ ‘The Zip Book.’ John is a prolific writer with over 100 publishing credits relating to his analysis of the ‘Climategate’ data fraud scandal involving criminal conduct by an elite clique of climate scientists.

I find it very difficult to take John’s comments seriously, and if you read some of the nonsense on the ClimateGate.com website of which he is a contributor it is very worrying.  John contributes to many blogs on climate change – he must have ‘Google Alerts’ (or similar) set for terms like ‘global warming’ which allows him to easily identify relevant content where he can copy and paste from a library of tosh (whilst building links and traffic to the ClimateGate.com website at the same time).

Basically, John believes he’s in a battle against the ‘religion of settled science’.  According the the ClimateGate website:

The goal of Climategate.com is to provide a daily dose of information regarding the world’s greatest scam, climategate, and other information and news to help you in your battle against the Religion of Settled Science to dispute their views on Anthropogenic Global Warming, and in addition, to battle the one-world socialist agenda, which is the movement’s leaders’ real goal.

So, Climategate.com publishes material that they hope others will spread across the internet, creating as much confusion as possible so that the normal man or woman in the street is unsure about the real science.  I’ve never been one for conspiracy theories, and to suggest that 97.5% of the world’s climate scientists are conspiring to create a one-world socialist government seems so far fetched it sounds laughable.

An example of the desperate measures the ClimateGate.com team undertakes is when they supported Nick Griffin from the BNP stating he ‘tells it like it is’.  They later decided to pull the article when even their normally supportive followers pointed out they’d gone a bit too far this time.

John O’ Sullivan states that he is pleased that the BNP have chosen to support the idea that AGW is a hoax.  You can see his comment here.

Here’s Mr Griffin in full flow:

Well, I don’t think it was John O’ Sullivan’s intention, but the more I’ve looked at what he and his colleagues have to say, the less respect I have for their arguments.

A rather boring post with little controversy

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

The last few posts I’ve added to the site seem to have ruffled a few feathers at times, and as I’m chilled out and half way through a bottle of Cabernet Sauvignon I thought I’d write a few thoughts which are unlikely to cause any controversy whatsoever.

[I guess at this point I've probably lost half of my readers].

6203 steps

This morning I was surprised to receive a gift from the marketing department at Profile 22. I’m not sure what they’re trying to tell me, but they have supplied me with a little device that clips on my belt and counts how many steps I take. Since around 10am this morning I have walked a massive 6203 steps.

Are you impressed? Well, I was really surprised and quite pleased with myself, but then I googled ‘average steps per day’ and found that the guidelines state I should be walking 10,000 steps per day! As I’m now sat on the couch with a glass of red wine, it’s unlikely I’m going to hit my target. (I have to confess also that I have actually fiddled the figures by finishing work early and taking the dogs for a long walk).

PIGS

No, don’t worry my wife has not gone out and bought some pigs to keep our donkeys company. No, I’m talking about the next Publicity in Glazing Society meeting next Thursday in London. The details are on the Glazine at this link.

Any excuse to socialise with industry professionals, I’ve booked train tickets and the hotel and am attending with our kid.

According to the press release:

Everyone who wants to socialise, network and yes, even talk business, is welcome to join editors, advertising, marketing, PR, event organisers and suppliers from the industry on Thursday 4 March.

If you’re going – I’ll see you there!

Huddersfield Town v Leeds United

I’m not sure if you’re aware but I’m a big fan of West Yorkshire’s best football team – Huddersfield Town. On Saturday we host local rivals Leeds United. It’s all set up to be a great game for the following reasons:

Huddersfield are unbeaten in the last 10 games
Huddersfield are the only team unbeaten at home this season
Huddersfield have won their last three games all away from home!
Leeds are in really poor form, although they won on Tuesday night
Of the last 4 times the two teams have played Town have won three and drawn one

With all this in mind, Leeds are bound to win!!! Conservatory Outlet and West Yorkshire Windows share a hospitality box at the Galpharm Stadium and we’ve got 5 town fans and 5 Leeds fans attending on Saturday. A few beers, friendly banter and hopefully a good game. I can’t wait!

Climate Change

I’ve enjoyed the debate on this website about whether climate change is human induced. I accept I need to do a lot more reading up, but at this stage having listened to all the arguments I’m becoming more and more convinced that global warming is happening.

But, if it isn’t then I think the following picture highlights why we should take action anyway:

climate change hoax

Humans are responsible for global warming

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

Following on from my previous post about whether humans are influencing climate change, I’ve been doing quite a lot of reading up on the subject.

An architect stumbled upon this site and added a number of links to resources which I have since looked at. I have also looked at a number of skeptic websites and tried to make my mind up as to whether humanity is responsible for global warming.

To me, the science appears to stack up and human activity is clearly affecting the global climate in a very worrying way.

I refer people to the Copenhagen Diagnosis Climate Science Report. This report covers the range of topics evaluated by Working Group I of the IPCC, namely the Physical Science Basis. This includes:

•an analysis of greenhouse gas emissions and their atmospheric concentrations, as well as the global carbon cycle;
•coverage of the atmosphere, the land-surface, the oceans, and all of the major components of the cryosphere (land-ice, glaciers, ice shelves, sea-ice and permafrost);
•paleoclimate, extreme events, sea level, future projections, abrupt change and tipping points;
•separate boxes devoted to explaining some of the common misconceptions surrounding climate change science.

For me, it is difficult to argue with the majority of scientists on this matter. I’ve also found reading the following website very informative:

http://www.withouthotair.com/

Without Hot Air is a free online book by a cambridge physics professor, who is currently government chief energy advisor, which seeks to outline the difficult energy problems we need to deal with urgently.

I also found a series of YouTube videos which helped me understand the topic in more detail, and dispel some of the arguments of the climate skeptics. Visit: http://www.youtube.com/user/potholer54?blend=1&ob=4

Potholer is a retired science correspondent, with a degree in geology, and argues a strong case that people should look at the real science, rather than listening to the various nonsense written in the media and blog sites. This is the first in a series of videos he has produced which are easy to understand and informative:

Interestingly, people have been voting on this blog for a couple of weeks now and providing me with feedback as to whether they believe humans are responsible for climate change and the results so far are:

climate change poll

Quite frankly, this is very worrying. If the majority of people don’t believe the science, or are unsure about the science, then it is unlikely that the politicians throughout the world will take the difficult decisions needed to radically overhaul the way we use energy in such a short period of time.

Interview with Giles Willson – BFRC

Friday, February 19th, 2010

In response to my previous post about the impending changes to affect the WER scheme, Giles Willson from the BFRC agreed to answer a few questions I put to him as follows:

Can you explain how the impending changes to the compliance with building regulations in October will affect the industry as a whole?

We will not know what the actual requirements for the revision to Approved Document L Conservation of fuel and power & Approved Document F Ventilation until they are published at the beginning of April 2010.

We know from the 2009 consultations that for England and Wales the proposal is WER band C for replacement windows and U value 1.8 for replacement doors. Regarding trickle ventilators within replacement windows these are going to be considered mandatory for all replacements. In addition conservatories are being considered to have the dispensation for compliance under ADL removed; this would mean conservatories would need to meet a thermal performance standard.

Therefore if you supply or fit replacement windows, doors or conservatories you will be effected; the actual details will be known in April – so watch this space.

There seems to be a lot of concern about the real value of solar gain in WER calculations. Wouldn’t we be better just setting tougher U Value requirements as part of the scheme?

The WER calculation takes into account the following:

Whole window U value
Solar gain
Air leakage

We all know that solar gain does make a difference to a building; the averaged constant used by the BFRC method simplifies the situation. Do you really want different window ratings for a North, South, East or West elevation, let alone a North, North East window?

The whole window U value is an element of the BFRC equation, it is important but WER’s reflects the solar gain aspect – a unique feature of glass compared to most other products used on the exterior elevation of homes.

Personally, I’m concerned that having WER’s as the only way of complying with building regulations will stifle innovation, choice and creates problems should any company in the supply chain cease trading. For example, what will an installer do if the company they purchase sealed units from ceases trading? Surely there needs to be a quick way for installers and fabricators to switch to an equivalent product from an equivalent supplier?

The WER Licence specifies the components used in a window; if these are no longer available the approved window is not a viable option, however the question did state that if your unit maker ceases trading what do you do. In these cases another unit maker, who can manufacture to the original specification (exact components etc.) can be used.

Regarding innovation; different components can be modelled within a simulation to check the overall effect on the rating – this is a very cost effective solution therefore we could argue we assist innovation.

I understand there are currently around 300 companies in the UK with an energy rating, but FENSA claim to have over 9000 companies in their scheme. Can the simulators simulate, the IA’s audit and the BFRC register the rest of the industry by October?

The number of companies stated are correct however, we do need to think about the supply chain. Many FENSA installers only undertake a few jobs, they use windows which have been bought in; these installers will buy in a window which is WER registered and install this as compliant with regulations.

You also have companies who fabricate and install – these companies need to get their own Licence or be part of the Authorised Retailer Scheme.

The authorised retailer scheme; this enables companies to use their frame supplier licence and either source their own units or buy from the frame supplier, and have their own BFRC WER Licence.

Therefore the number of additional Licences will increase if WER band C is made mandatory however, not all 9000 FENSA Registered businesses will require their own Licences.

Do you think that these proposed changes will ultimately force many smaller sealed unit manufacturers, PVC-U fabricators and installers out of business?

We do not believe that it is the Governments intention that any company goes out of business due to regulatory changes. However, regardless if the Building Regulations require WER or whole window U values these would need to be calculated for every combination of glass, unit and frame.

With the more demanding specifications, products do require verification; therefore companies who have undertaken the preparation and have data on their products should survive. Companies who have not undertaken a simulation or have data on the whole window U value or WER will be disadvantaged and could result in their failure.

For more information about the BFRC visit http://www.bfrc.org/

Random thoughts

Monday, February 8th, 2010

I’ve been so chilled out today. Nothing seems to be getting me wound up at all, even my wife seems to be making sense.

Unfortunately, others around me seem to be losing their heads. I’m particularly referring to some of the comments on this blog recently. One of the problems with the internet is that people often rant at each other in ways they wouldn’t do if they were face to face. I had to disable comments on our YouTube videos as many of the comments were completely out of order. Generally, on this website, people are civilised, although I do delete a number of comments each month which are not suitable.

It’s great that people are passionate, and the debate between various contributors is mostly better than any content I write. But, I would prefer people to show a little more restraint in some instances.

Fair Trade Hardware

A few weeks ago I wrote about my concerns that people in the Far East were being exploited while manufacturing hardware products to fit to UK windows and doors. I’ll be honest, I haven’t made any progress with my thinking, albeit I do have a meeting with my main hardware supplier to discuss in the near future.

I did put a comment on here that I would welcome the opportunity to visit any UK hardware supplier’s factory in China to see the conditions for myself. As yet, I haven’t had any offers ;-)

Global Warming / Climate Change

I’m still trying to get my head around whether human induced climate change is actually happening. There’s been some very informed comments on the original post I wrote, and many thanks to those who have voted. At the moment, it looks like people are equally as confused as myself. If you haven’t voted yet, you can do so at the right hand side.

Why I don’t watch TV any more

Many thanks to John Keleher at Crittall Windows for mentioning this post on Twitter, which very much sums up why I continue adding content to this website:

http://ow.ly/14Qaz

I often get asked why I bother, and sometimes it’s difficult to explain why I feel the need to keep writing all this stuff. Well, it’s difficult to fully quantify, and I have questioned many times why I bother, but I feel the above post pretty much sums up why I prefer blogging to watching TV.

GlassTalk

I haven’t mentioned GlassTalk for a while, mainly because the dust has been settling from the last event. Tomorrow we’re finishing early and travelling down to Warwickshire to view a rather posh hotel. Nothing is fixed yet, but it is more than likely going to happen on May 27th, so if you’re thinking of attending it would pay to leave this day free in your diary. More news to follow.

The wider issue of Window Scrappage that no-one is picking up on

Monday, November 16th, 2009

Guest post by Rob

I decided the following comment from one of my readers deserved a post of its own:

“There is a wider issue that no-one is picking up on. To get the UK’s CO2 emissions down, the onus is going to fall on the householder, not road traffic (how dare anyone interfere with our right to wheels!), not air travel (I WANT my annual holiday!), not industry (UK has to be competitive, unlimited growth, city bonuses).

99.9% of UK housing stock is already built, and to the lowest standards the building industry can get away with. Even new houses are poorly designed (poor detailing on insulation/airtightness, no microrenewables, poor design re solar gain, too many ensuites, no easily accessible central services, no peripheral cool food storage).

Faced with accelerating CO2 emissions, and genuinely scared of what climate change may bring, the government/insurance industry/media have promoted micro-renewable energy generation without realising that

1) they are of no use unless the house is thoroughly insulated, and
2) because sun, wind etc do not generate electricity/heat at convenient times, hence the power source must be linked to the grid, and the householder paid (meter driven in reverse) at a rate to make it worthwhile.

But first, to retrofit insulation, and install most micro-renewables is destructive and very expensive. To rub salt in, and this is my main point, YOU PAY 15% TAX (SOON TO BE 20%) ON YOUR BUILDERS TIME, ON THE INSULATING MATERIALS, ON EXCAVATING, PIPEWORK AND EVERYTHING REQUIRED TO GET YOUR HOUSE BACK TO NORMAL!

For most people, if your job and life are uncertain, if you may move house, then the disruption and expense are not worthwhile. The payback time of most microrenewable equipment, alone, is measured in decades.

We have to insulate below solid and suspended timber floors, take up and insulate under flat roof, relocate and replace oil boiler with biomass boiler, and apart from a grant for the boiler, we have to pay (2010 onwards) 20% tax to HMRC. on all labour and costs – where is the logic in that, and should we bother?

It’s illuminating that most MPs expenses claims were for tarty makeovers rather than, say for dry lining their entire house and installing a ground-source heat pump! Shows how much they understand the problem of retro-insulating the UK’s housing stock!

This window scrappage idea is just one small part of an impasse we are all in. What next for scrappage? In logical order of emissions/heat loss we should then have a roof scrappage scheme, then walls, doors, floors, boilers … Firstly, building materials related to energy conservation must be zero-VAT rated.”

10 Reasons to be optimistic about the future

Sunday, November 8th, 2009

I thought I’d put in words why I feel we’re in a unique position right now which is unlike any other time I’ve experienced running a uPVC window and conservatory company.

We’re at a turning point where I believe that well positioned, financially sound, forward thinking companies in our industry are in a great position to strengthen their position, grow sales and make profits in the coming years. I’m focussing my thoughts on installation companies and fabricators in the residential uPVC sector, although my thinking can also apply to associated companies.

1. Downturn levelling out for uPVC industry

Over the last two years the market for uPVC windows, doors and conservatories has contracted dramatically. In fact, since 2003/2004 our industry has been in continual decline.

The latest research suggests that this downward trend will continue in 2010, but at a far slower rate, levelling off in 2011 and maybe even growth returning in 2012. For any company that has maintained sales, or even grown their sales, during a time when the market has been shrinking so dramatically, will find a levelling off period feel like a real growth spurt. Imagine your company has grown sales over the last two years at 5% per year, when the market as a whole has declined 20% each year. If the market stabilises, then such a company would find 25% growth reasonably easy by comparison.

2. End of Recession

The UK has been in recession for 6 consecutive quarters. The Bank of England has recently pumped a further £25bn into the economy to help bring us out of recession. France and Germany exited recession in the second quarter, and the US came out of recession in the third quarter. It was a surprise that the UK did not return to growth in the third quarter, so it seems likely that the UK will follow the other major economies in Q4.

recession graph uk

I appreciate that it may seem tough right now, but with the media now talking about recovery, rather than talking about recession (or even depression) then I feel that gradually confidence will return. People buy our products when they feel confident about the future, particularly conservatories. As people start to feel more confident about the economy and their own position in it, then they are more likely to choose to purchase big ticket items.

3. Housing market picking up

The latest surveys from the Halifax and the Nationwide suggest that house prices have virtually recovered to the rates they were at 12 months ago.

house prices graph uk

I appreciate many experts are talking about houses prices going back down, but with fewer houses being built over the last few years, and the population increasing, there’s still an undersupply of housing.

I believe that we’ve seen the end of house price declines, and although we may not see growth like we have in the past, we will see growth nevertheless. Our industry relies on the movements in the housing market. As people move home, they either make improvements to increase their chances of a sale, or they make improvements to their new home after they’ve purchased.

The Home Information Packs will have improved demand for energy efficient windows and doors, and as more houses are bought and sold, then demand for windows and doors will increase.

Also, as house prices increase, then conservatories become a more sensible investment. As house prices are falling, then consumers could look unfavourably upon making investments in further extensions to their home. But, as house prices increase then people will feel more confident that a conservatory is a more sensible investment.

4. Mortgages / Interest Rates

People on variable rate mortgages have never had it so good. Even though you could argue that the banks are taking advantage of the low interest rates, and not passing the rates on to mortgages, I still feel that mortgage rates are at very low levels compared to recent history.

If the banks free up more capital, and relax their lending policy and if the interest rates stay at 0.5% for a sustained period then more mortgages will be granted. This will have a positive effect on house prices, and encourage people to remortgage to fund home improvements.

5. Lots of weaker competitors have disappeared

Although the number of fabricators and installers ceasing to trade so far in this recession has been lower than many people thought, I have certainly seen a number of my competitors go bust.

I have noticed that mostly the less professional, low price retailers have struggled and disappeared. Sure, many of these companies have phoenixed but often in a smaller way which will have less impact on the more professional survivors.

Now is a time to take market share!

6. Global warming / Climate Change

Whether you believe global warming and climate change is happening, I hate to say that this potential catastrophe is a short term opportunity for window companies.

polarbear

Some installers are taking this opportunity by the horns and successfully promoting energy efficient windows in a big way. With carbon emissions high on the global agenda and the current high cost of fuel, we are all looking for ways to make our homes more energy efficient. The more the industry gets together and pushes the energy saving message and lower fuel bills, then the more windows we will all sell.

7. Government Intervention

If the world is to fully tackle climate change, then Government intervention has to happen at some point.

In November 2008, the Government passed the Climate Change Act which set a legally binding target for the United Kingdom to reduce greenhouse gas, emissions by 80% compared to 1990 levels by 2050, with an interim target of 26% by 2020 (which has subsequently been increased to 34%).

Transport consistently grabs the headlines on climate change emissions but buildings pour out about half of the UK’s CO2 – 30% from homes, 20% from commercial buildings.

It is generally recognised that if you live in a single glazed house and install Energy Efficient Windows you could reduce the energy you use by 0.30 tonnes (or 18%) per year. The Government cannot just assume consumers will take the decision to install the latest in energy rated windows, or loft insulation, or any other energy saving product.

Government intervention has to happen at some point, whether through reduced VAT, a window scrappage scheme, grants or creating legal requirements for upgrading our homes, and when this happens our industry will be well positioned to benefit.

8. Timber Too Expensive

We can argue all day long about the environmental credentials of both PVC-U and timber windows. There are strong opinions from both sides.

But, one thing cannot be argued about. Good quality timber windows are out of the financial reach of the vast majority of homeowners. Whereas good quality uPVC windows are very affordable. This isn’t going to change, and with more foil options, better hardware, and more energy efficient uPVC options available, I believe that uPVC is ready to fight back!

saveatreebuyupvc

Save a tree, buy uPVC!

9. Replacing the Replacements

It doesn’t take a genius to point out that most houses now have uPVC windows these days – just drive down most housing estates in the UK and it’s perfectly clear.

The challenge now is to ‘replace the replacements’ and I believe this emerging market is gathering pace. Conservatory Outlet now sends all post consumer replacement uPVC windows off for recycling, and the numbers of frames we’re getting back from dealers is amazing (100-200 frames per week). Lister trade Frames recently pointed out that consumers are replacing relatively recent uPVC installations, so they can benefit from better designs and more energy efficient windows.

listertradeframesrecycling

Let’s face it, many of the uPVC windows and doors installed in the 1980’s and 1990’s was badly sold. As installation companies start replacing more uPVC windows, then the natural spirit of ‘Keeping Up With The Jones’ will gather pace.

10. Still a very big market!

Finally, I just want to point out that despite the fact that the double glazing and conservatory market has shrunk dramatically, it’s still a very, very big industry.

There’s loads of profitable work out there to be had.

You just need to know how to find it!

Energy Efficient Windows video from Anglian

Monday, October 19th, 2009

Hat’s off to Anglian with the following video, which effectively shows the benefit of choosing energy rated windows compared to single glazing:

I’m not trying to put ideas in to people’s heads, but surely a similar and generic version of this video to be used by any company marketing A, B and C rated windows and provided by the BFRC would be useful in getting the message across.

Copies of a video like this would be useful for sales staff, and marketing departments to use on their websites.

  • Sponsors

  • image widget
  • image widget
  • image widget
  • image widget
  • image widget
  • image widget
© 2010 Renegade Conservatory Guy